Art. 60.b of the Law on Media stipulates that online media platforms shall bear legal responsibility, both towards third parties and before the judiciary, for the content they publish as well as for any associated user-generated comments. This can be intended as a monitoring requirement.

It is reported that cybercafé proprietors are required to monitor their customers' online activity and maintain detailed records.

Reports indicate that, during 2024, numerous sites were blocked, including platforms such as TikTok.

The indicator "7.2.4 - Government Internet shut down in practice" of the V-Dem Dataset, which measures whether the government has the technical capacity to actively make internet service cease, thus interrupting domestic access to the internet or whether the government has decided to do so, has a score of 2 in the Syrian Arab Republic for the year 2024. This corresponds to "The government shut down domestic access to the Internet several times this year."
Syria is reported to rank as the third most frequent implementer of internet shutdowns globally between 2018 and 2025, with a total of 73 recorded instances. In 2024 alone, the country reportedly imposed shutdowns on several occasions, including during periods of civil protest and purportedly to prevent academic dishonesty during examinations.

It is reported that Syria began requesting accreditation for the electronic applications sector in 2020. However, all licensing and permit requirements previously imposed on the provision of services through electronic applications were abolished in 2025.

The Arab League, of which Syria is a member, has maintained a boycott of Israeli companies and goods manufactured in Israel since its original implementation in 1948. Syria mandates participation in, or cooperation with, this international boycott. These restrictions affect the import of goods and services.
Art. 2 of Law No. 286 of 1956 establishes an import prohibition concerning Israel, stipulating that the entry, exchange, or commercial circulation of goods, commodities, and products of any description, as well as Israeli financial instruments and other transferable securities, into the territory of the Syrian Republic is forbidden, whether originating directly from Israel or arriving through indirect channels.

Chapter VII of Syria’s Law No. 12 regarding the Protection of Electronic Personal Data on the Network regulates the cross-border transfer of personal data. Art. 15 prohibits the transfer, processing, or storage of personal data to any foreign or Arab state unless the receiving jurisdiction ensures an adequate level of protection, verified and authorised by the competent authority. However, paragraph (b) of the same article permits such transfers to jurisdictions lacking equivalent safeguards under specific conditions, including the explicit consent of the data subject, the preservation of life, provision of healthcare, fulfilment of contractual obligations, compliance with judicial requirements, protection of public interest, or implementation of bilateral or multilateral agreements to which Syria is a party. Art. 16 further allows controllers or processors to share personal data with counterparts abroad, subject to prior authorisation and the fulfilment of three conditions: compatibility of operational purposes, the existence of a legitimate interest, and assurance that the foreign entity maintains legal and technical protections equivalent to those prescribed in the law’s executive regulations.

The Syrian Arab Republic has not joined any agreement with binding commitments to open transfers of data across borders.

Law No. 12 regarding the Protection of Electronic Personal Data on the Network establishes a comprehensive regime for data protection in the Syrian Arab Republic. It grants rights to data subjects and designates the authority responsible for enforcing personal data protection.

Art. 3.a.1 of the Cybercrime Law mandates that internet service providers (ISPs) retain traffic data pertaining to all subscribers for a duration specified by the competent authorities. In addition, Art. 4 of the same legislation obliges ISPs to preserve copies of both traffic data and hosted digital content.

Art. 61 of the Law on Media stipulates that online media outlets are required to retain a copy of all published content in its various forms, as well as traffic data enabling the verification of the identity of individuals contributing to such content on the network, for a period determined by the Council. These data and materials shall be subject to professional confidentiality; however, they must be disclosed to the judicial authority upon request.

Section 4 (Arts. 66–75) of Law No. 18 of 2012 establishes a comprehensive framework for the protection of trade secrets. Art. 66 provides that undisclosed information shall be protected where it possesses a confidential character, derives commercial value from its secrecy, and depends on measures adopted by its lawful owner to maintain such confidentiality. Art. 68.4 grants the lawful possessor the right to seek judicial recourse, while Art. 69.2 classifies the disclosure, possession, or use of such information by persons aware of their lack of authorisation as an infringement. Art. 75 states that, in respect of matters not expressly regulated under the provisions on undisclosed information, the rules applicable to invention patents shall apply mutatis mutandis.

Art. 41 of the Telecommunications Law stipulates that any licensee holding a dominant position within the market is obliged to accommodate all reasonable requests for access to its essential telecommunications facilities, in accordance with the procedures established by the regulatory authority and in a manner consistent with both the Reference Offer and the licensee’s disclosed future plans. In fulfilling this obligation, the licensee must apply equivalent conditions in comparable circumstances and act without discrimination. In addition, the authority may, in exceptional cases and for the purpose of ensuring interoperability, impose obligations upon licensees that do not possess a dominant position, requiring them to grant access to their essential telecommunications facilities under terms prescribed by the authority.
Essential telecommunications facilities, as defined in Art. 2, refer to those facilities owned, controlled, or provided by a limited number of licensees, the use of which is indispensable for other operators or service providers to deliver their services, given that duplication or substitution would not be technically or economically feasible. Such facilities include, inter alia, buildings, towers, antenna masts, cables, conduits, local loops, switches, easements, rights of way, and other elements as determined by the authority.

Syrian Telecom, formally designated as the Syrian Telecommunications Establishment, functions as a telecommunications entity under the authority of the Syrian government. It is organised as a joint-stock company that is wholly owned by the state.

The Syrian Arab Republic does not impose functional separation on operators with significant market power (SMP) in the telecommunications sector. However, an obligation for accounting separation has been in place since 2010. Art. 42.b of the Telecommunication Law (Law No. 18 of 2010) stipulates that licensees with significant market power must maintain separate accounts for their services, ensuring that the costs and revenues associated with each service are presented distinctly. This must be achieved through a cost-modelling accounting system approved by the regulatory authority. The authority also retains discretion to determine which services are subject to these provisions.