The State of South Africa exclusively owns Broadband Infraco, a state-licensed telecommunications company. The State is the only shareholder and member of Infraco, as stipulated in Art. 3 of the Broadband Infraco Act No. 33 of 2007. As a result, the Minister has the power to act on behalf of the State and exercise all the rights and benefits associated with Infraco's ownership, including shareholder and membership rights, to the exclusion of other stakeholders.

According to Art. 64.2 of the Electronic Communications Act, not more than 20% of the directors of a commercial broadcasting licensee may be foreigners. Additionally, according to Art. 4 of the Digital Sound Broadcasting Services Regulation, existing sound broadcasting service licensees may simulcast their existing sound broadcasting programme(s) on analogue and digital platforms.

It is reported that merger and acquisition-related FDI is scrutinised closely for its impact on jobs and local industry. Sections 13-14 of the Competition Act of 1998 set out the approval mechanism for mergers. In addition, Section 14 of the Competition Amendment Act of 2018 amends Section 18A of the Competition Act, adding a screening in case the implementation of a merger involving a foreign acquiring firm may have an adverse effect on the national security interests of the Republic. National security interests are defined broadly, including "critical infrastructure" sectors.

According to Art. 23.1 of the Companies Act, any external company, defined in the law as an entity incorporated outside the country conducting business within South Africa, must register with the Commission within 20 business days after it begins to conduct business in the country. Additionally, according to Art. 23.3 of the law, each company must maintain at least one office in the Republic and register the address of its office or its principal office if it has more than one office. A company falls under the definition of "external company" when holding a meeting or meetings of the shareholders or board of the foreign company or otherwise conducting the internal affairs of the company; establishing or maintaining any bank or other financial accounts; establishing or maintaining offices or agencies for the transfer, exchange or registration of the foreign company’s securities; creating or acquiring any debts, mortgages or security interests in any property; securing or collecting any debt, or enforcing any mortgage or security interest; acquiring any interest in any property; and entering into contracts of employment.

Practical restrictions on patent enforcement have been recorded in the country, including a lack of transparency, lengthy proceedings, and non-deterrent sanctions. These include:
- Non-infringement opinions: The South African courts have emphasised the importance of obtaining a non-infringement opinion before pursuing patent litigation. Failure to obtain such an opinion may result in an award of costs against the patent owner.
- Limitations on the rights conferred by a patent: Under South African law, the rights conferred by a patent are limited by certain exceptions, such as fair dealing for research and private study. 
- Requirement for specificity: South African courts require patent owners to be specific about the alleged infringing activities, including identifying the infringing products or processes.
- Invalidity challenges: Patents may be challenged on the grounds of invalidity, such as lack of novelty or inventiveness. This may result in the revocation of the patent.

South Africa is a party to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). However, the country does not consider itself bound by Art. 59 related to disputes.

South Africa has a clear regime of copyright exceptions that follows the fair dealing model, which enables the lawful use of copyrighted work by others without obtaining permission. Section 12 of the Copyright Act lists the exceptions, which include private reproduction for personal purposes, reproduction and other utilisation for teaching and scientific non-commercial purposes, reproduction, broadcasting, and other communication to the public for informatory purposes, among others.

Copyright is not adequately enforced online in South Africa. It has been reported that enforcing copyright online in the country is challenging, particularly in the music, film, and software industries. Online piracy and infringement of copyright laws are prevalent in the country, and many entities, locally and internationally, have expressed concerns about inadequate enforcement mechanisms and legal frameworks. In addition, it is reported that South Africa failed to reach the mandated levels of copyright protection under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), especially regarding the enforcement of online copyright and piracy. Moreover, industry associations such as the Southern African Music Rights Organization (SAMRO) and the Recording Industry of South Africa (RiSA) have also raised concerns about widespread piracy and infringement of copyright laws in the country.

South Africa has signed the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty in December 1997, but has not ratified it.

South Africa has signed the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty in December 1997, but has not ratified it.

South Africa does not have specific legislation governing trade secrets or know-how, though they can be effectively protected under South African common law.

It is reported that there is no obligation for passive infrastructure sharing in South Africa to deliver telecom services to end users. However, it is practised in both the mobile and fixed sectors based on commercial agreements.

The State of South Africa exclusively owns Broadband Infraco, a state-licensed telecommunications company. The State is the only shareholder and member of Infraco, as stipulated in Art. 3 of the Broadband Infraco Act No. 33 of 2007. As a result, the Minister has the power to act on behalf of the State and exercise all the rights and benefits associated with Infraco's ownership, including shareholder and membership rights, to the exclusion of other stakeholders.

It is reported that the Preferential Procurement Regulations have created uncertainty regarding the criteria for identifying "specific previously disadvantaged groups" eligible for preference margins in procurement processes. Although the regulations do not mandate the use of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act of 2013, state entities may still consider it alongside other objectives, such as employment equity, green procurement, and local content. While these regulations offer more flexibility, there are ongoing concerns that the allocation of preference points may not be fair, equitable, or transparent.