Trinidad and Tobago is not a signatory of the 1996 World Trade Organization (WTO) Information Technology Agreement (ITA) nor the 2015 expansion (ITA II).

Taiwan has not adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Commerce.

Taiwan has not adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Signatures.

The Fair Trading Act (1991), the Consumer Protection Act (2015), and the Electronic Signatures Act (2001) provide a comprehensive consumer protection framework that also applies to online transactions. The former aims to ensure free and fair competition and promote economic stability and prosperity. In addition, the Consumer Protection Law (2015) is enacted when it comes to distance selling and information marketing. In addition, the Electronic Signatures Law (2001) facilitates secure electronic transactions by recognizing the validity of electronic records.

Taiwan has not signed the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts.

It is reported that the de minimis threshold, that is the minimum value of goods below which customs do not charge duties, is 2,000 TWD (approx. 62 USD), below the 200 USD threshold recommended by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). It is reported that this has been reduced from 3,000 TWD (approx. 93 USD) which was applied before 2018.

The National Communications Commission (NCC) is an independent Taiwanese Statutory agency created for the purpose of regulating information, communications standards, licensing, radio frequency, spectrum and broadcasting. The Compliance Approval Regulations on Controlled Telecommunications Radio-Frequency Devices, promulgated in 1997 and recently amended in 2017, stipulates that radio transmission and telecom equipment must get NCC Radio Type Approval in order to be marketed in Taiwan. NCC is responsible for Taiwan’s radio frequency management and requires mandatory testing either through local recognised laboratories or through foreign laboratories recognized by NCC (MRA Countries only). It is advisable to perform testing through a locally recognised laboratory as it will significantly simplify the process.

Under the Commodity Inspection Act, commodities inspection is conducted in four schemes: batch-by-batch inspection, monitoring inspection, registration of product certification, and declaration of conformity. The declaration of conformity (DoC) is considered to be the least-trade-restrictive conformity assessment procedure and it is applied only to low-risk products with stable manufacturing technology and few concerns of risk or danger. Under the DoC, manufacturers may have testing done by the Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection (BSMI)-designated laboratories, prepare their own technical documents, and draft the DoC form themselves.
The Bureau of Standards, Metrology, and Inspection recognize the designated testing laboratories to conduct the testing of commodities subject to inspection.

The export control regime under the Foreign Trade Act (1993) regulates the export of military and dual-use goods, technologies, and technology and includes a wide range of products, potentially affecting digital trade. According to Art. 13 of the Act, the exportation of such goods must comply with the following provisions:
- No exportation is allowed unless otherwise authorized;
- Where import permits are granted, no change of the importer or transfer to any third country or region is allowed unless otherwise authorized;
- Intended use and end-user shall be truthfully declared; no change is allowed unless otherwise authorized;
- Specific strategic high-tech goods transported to the restricted regions may not transit, transship or become stored in bonded warehouses, logistics centers, and free ports via any commercial port of this country without authorization. Further detailed rules and regulations are specified in the Regulations Governing Export and Import of Strategic High-tech Commodities (1994).

In August 2020, the Ministry of Economics announced that Taiwanese companies could not provide video streaming-related services originating with Chinese companies or people, particularly iQIYI or Tencent, starting from September 2020. The rule updated Art. 35 of the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, and formally prohibited companies and individuals in Taiwan to be the agents or distributors of any Chinese over-the-top services (OTT) via television or other broadcast, including the digital-television channel service Media on Demand.

Under the Second Category of Telecommunications Business Management Rules promulgated in August 2014, pursuant to Art. 17 of the Telecommunications Management Act, the country has implemented mandatory SIM card registration requirements. In addition, In 2017, the National Communications Commission stated that when applying for a house number or prepaid card, people should apply for dual certificates, and telecommunications businesses (including their resellers) should verify and log in user information.

It is reported that intermediary liability also extends to fake news. If social media platforms on which users disseminate fake news remove the fake news after receiving complaints in a timely manner, liability should not attach to such social media platforms.

The Copyright Act as amended in 2009 with the introduction of Arts. 90-4 to 90-12 establishes a safe harbour regime for intermediaries for copyright infringements. They largely follow the framework of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Internet service providers are divided into four categories with different conditions of eligibility of limitation on liability: connection service providers, caching service providers, information storage service providers, and search service providers.

According to Art. 46 of the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (2003), Internet platform providers shall take measures to limit the receiving and browsing of harmful Internet contents or remove the harmful Internet contents in advance, but after being informed by competent authorities that the Internet contents are harmful to the physical and mental health of children and youth, or that no clear and workable protective measures are taken. Under Art. 94, platform providers who fail to take such measures are fined.