Peru is a signatory of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Information Technology Agreement (ITA) of 1996 but is not a signatory of its 2015 expansion (ITA II).

Jamaica has adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Signatures.

It is reported that market approval for products using radio technologies in Jamaica is granted by the Spectrum Management Authority (SMA). The SMA certification is a national certification scheme based on the specifications of the Conformité Européenne (CE) marking, the Radio Equipment Directive (RED), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) certification. However, it is reported that, in Jamaica, typically one sample of the product is required for approval requests.
Tests and certificates issued for CE marking and FCC certification can be reused for SMA certification. Type approval for Radio Communication equipment in Jamaica is obtained through the recognition of type approval test reports prepared in accordance with international standards. However, technical documents must be reviewed and validated by the Bureau of Standards, Jamaica.

According to the Jamaica Customs Agency official website, the de minimis threshold, that is the minimum value of goods below which customs do not charge duties, is USD 100, below the 200 USD threshold recommended by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

The Electronic Transactions Act and the Consumer Protection Act provide a comprehensive framework for consumer protection that also applies to online transactions.

Jamaica has not signed the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts.

Jamaica has adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Commerce.

According to Section 1 of Art. 31 of The Data Protection Act, personal data shall not be transferred to a State or territory outside of Jamaica unless that State or territory ensures an adequate level of protection for the rights and freedoms of data subjects in relation to the processing of personal data. However, according to Section 3 of Art. 31, the aforementioned condition is not necessary for a transfer that falls within any of the cases specified in subsection 4, including:
- The interested individual consents to the transfer;
- The transfer is necessary for the performance of a contract between the data subject and the data processor;
- The transfer is necessary for reasons of substantial public interest;
- The transfer is necessary for the purpose of, or in connection with, any legal proceedings (including possible legal proceedings);
- The transfer is necessary to protect the vital interests of the data subject;
- The transfer is made on terms that are of a kind approved by the Commissioner as ensuring adequate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects;
- The Commissioner has authorised the transfer to be made in a manner that ensures adequate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects;
- The transfer is necessary for the purposes of national security or the prevention, detection, or investigation of criminal offences.

Jamaica has not joined any free trade agreement committing to open transfers of cross-border data flows.

The Data Protection Act provides a comprehensive regime of data protection.

According to Art. 45 of The Data Protection Act, a data controller shall submit to the Commissioner a data protection impact assessment (DPIA) in respect of all personal data in the custody or control of the data controller. The data protection impact assessment form shall require at least the following information:
- Detailed description of the envisaged processing of the personal data and the purposes of the processing, specifying, where applicable, the legitimate interest pursued by the data controller;
- Assessment of the necessity and proportionality of the processing operations in relation to the purposes;
- Assessment of the risks to the rights and freedoms of data subjects;
- Measures envisaged addressing the risks, including safeguards, security measures, and mechanisms to protect personal data and demonstrate compliance with the Act.
In addition, specific categories of data controllers are required to appoint a data protection officer (DPO) under the Act. These categories include: data controllers who are public authorities; data controllers who process, or intend to process, sensitive personal data or data relating to criminal convictions; data controllers who process personal data on a large scale; and data controllers designated by the Commissioner as requiring a DPO.

The Electronic Transactions Act establishes a safe harbour regime for intermediaries for copyright infringements. According to Art. 25 of the law, an intermediary shall not be held liable in any civil or criminal proceedings for any information contained in an electronic document in respect of which the intermediary provides services if:
- the intermediary is not the originator of the document;
- it has no actual knowledge of the act or omission that gives rise to the civil or criminal liability, as the case may be, in respect of the document; and
- it has no knowledge of any facts or circumstances from which the likelihood of such civil or criminal liability ought reasonably to have been known.

The Electronic Transactions Act establishes a safe harbour regime for intermediaries beyond copyright infringements. According to Art. 25 of the law, an intermediary shall not be held liable in any civil or criminal proceedings for any information contained in an electronic document in respect of which the intermediary provides services if:
- the intermediary is not the originator of the document;
- it has no actual knowledge of the act or omission that gives rise to the civil or criminal liability, as the case may be, in respect of the document; and
- it has no knowledge of any facts or circumstances from which the likelihood of such civil or criminal liability ought reasonably to have been known.