It is reported that Austria mandates functional and accounting separation for operators with significant market power (SMP) in the telecom market.

It is reported that the Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and Telecommunications (RTR), the executive authority for the supervision and administration of services in the telecommunications sector, is independent from the government in the decision-making process.

The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides a comprehensive framework for data protection that applies to all EU Member States. In Austria, the Federal Act on the Protection of Individuals With Regard to the Processing of Personal Data implements the GDPR.

In Austria, a screening mechanism was first introduced with Section 25a of the Foreign Trade Act 2011. The Act has been replaced in July 2020 by the Austrian Investment Control Act, which provides different scenarios where screening applies. The main relevant scenarios triggering the screening are, under certain circumstances, as follows:
- Acquisition of 10% or more of voting rights in the company when related to the following digitally sensitive sectors: defence equipment/defence technology; critical energy infrastructure; critical digital infrastructure (in particular 5G infrastructure); systems that enable data sovereignty of the Republic of Austria;
- Establishment of a new branch in Austria if an Austrian undertaking is acquired by a foreign entity and the relevant thresholds are met;
- Establishment of a new company in which foreign investors will have more than 10% voting rights.
The Foreign Direct Investment Screening Act provides that some transactions are exempt from the approval requirement where the target is a very small undertaking with less than ten employees and an annual turnover or annual balance of no more than 2 million euros.

In May 2023, Austria prohibited the installation and private use of TikTok on work devices issued to federal employees, following recommendations from the country's intelligence services and ministry experts. The decision was part of a broader trend among European governments to address cybersecurity concerns associated with the Chinese-owned app. In response, TikTok expressed disappointment, stating that the ban was implemented without citing specific security concerns or consulting the company.

Art. 85 of the Utilities Directive (2014/25/EU) contains provisions allowing contracting public entities to reject foreign goods not covered by any EU international commitments from its tender procedures. In these cases, a tender submitted for the award of a supply contract may be rejected where the proportion of the products originating in third countries exceeds 50% of the total value of the products constituting the tender (Art. 85.2). Additionally, in cases of equivalent offers, the provisions provide for a preference for European tenders and tenders covered by EU's international obligations. In practice, this possibility has rarely been used.
In Austria, the Directive has been transposed by the BKA: Federal Act amending the Federal Public Procurement Act 2006 and the Federal Public Procurement Act 2012, as well as by the Public Procurement Act Reform Act 2018.

There are limits to the proportion of shares that can be acquired by foreign investors in publicly-controlled firms. In particular, the public broadcaster ORF is organised as a foundation under public law, resulting in additional requirements in order to acquire shares in ORF. This is further aggravated by the fact that the public broadcaster receives a major part of its financing through a broadcasting fee (Programmentgelt). ORF also conducts activities online.

Art. 13 of Presidential Legislative Decree No. 10/19, also known as the Customs Tariffs Law, specifies that goods for personal use sent through the post office, courier, or express cargo operators are exempt from the dispatch procedure and payment of customs duties as long as they cumulatively are below the limit per traveller's remittance, set at 2,640 Fiscal Correction Unit (UCF), the equivalent of 232,320 kwanzas (approximately USD 200). More recently, Art. 15 of Law No. 31/21 introduced changes to the Custom Tariffs Law, raising the threshold for personal goods to 1,000,000 kwanzas (approximately USD 1,200), which is above the 200 USD threshold recommended by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

Angola lacks a comprehensive framework for consumer protection that applies to online transactions.

Angola has not signed the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts.

Angola has not adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Commerce.

Angola has not adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Signatures.

A basic legal framework on intermediary liability beyond copyright infringement is absent in Angola's law and jurisprudence.