LIBYA
ITA signatory?
I
II
Pillar Tariffs and trade defence measures applied on ICT goods |
Indicator Effective tariff rate on ICT goods (applied weighted average)
Effective tariff rate to ICT goods (applied weighted average)
3.48%
Coverage rate of zero-tariffs on ICT goods (%)
16.69%
Coverage: ICT goods
Sources
- http://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/
- https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/brief_ita_e.htm#:~:text=ITA%20participants%3A%20Australia%3B%20Bahrain%3B,%3B%20Jordan%3B%20Korea%2C%20Rep.
- https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/ita20years_2017_full_e.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220120054410/https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/april/tradoc_154430.pdf
- https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/inftec_e/itscheds_e.htm
LIBYA
N/A
Pillar Tariffs and trade defence measures applied on ICT goods |
Indicator Participation in the WTO Information Technology Agreement (ITA) and 2015 expansion (ITA II)
Lack of participation in the Information Technology Agreement (ITA) and in ITA Expansion Agreement (ITA II)
Libya is not a signatory of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Information Technology Agreement (ITA) of 1996 and its 2015 expansion (ITA II). In fact, Libya is not a Member of the WTO.
Coverage ICT goods
Sources
- https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/brief_ita_e.htm#:~:text=ITA%20participants%3A%20Australia%3B%20Bahrain%3B,%3B%20Jordan%3B%20Korea%2C%20Rep.
- https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/ita20years_2017_full_e.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220120054410/https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/april/tradoc_154430.pdf
- https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/inftec_e/itscheds_e.htm
- Show more...
LIBYA
Since March 1957
Since October 2024
Since October 2024
Pillar Public procurement of ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Exclusion from public procurement
Law No. 62 of 1957 on the Boycott of Israel
قانون رقم 62 لسنة 1957 م بشأن مقاطعة إسرائيل
Decision No. 600 of 2024 issuing the Administrative Contracts Regulation
قرار رقم 600 لسنة 2024 م بإصدار لائحة العقود الإدارية
قانون رقم 62 لسنة 1957 م بشأن مقاطعة إسرائيل
Decision No. 600 of 2024 issuing the Administrative Contracts Regulation
قرار رقم 600 لسنة 2024 م بإصدار لائحة العقود الإدارية
Under Art. 1 of the Law on the Boycott of Israel, any natural or legal person is prohibited from entering into agreements, whether directly or indirectly, with individuals or entities residing in Israel, holding Israeli nationality, or acting on its behalf, as well as with national or foreign companies that maintain interests, branches, or general agencies in Israel. In addition, Art. 18 of the Administrative Contracts Regulation mandates that applicants for administrative contracts comply with decisions issued by the competent authorities regarding the boycott of any state or the prohibition of dealings therewith, and requires that every such contract include a clause obliging the parties to adhere to these decisions and accept their consequences.
Coverage Israel-affiliated entities
LIBYA
Since April 2023
Pillar Public procurement of ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Exclusion from public procurement
Circular of the Minister of Economy and Trade No. 4-2023
منشور وزير الاقتصاد والتجارة رقم 4 لسنة 2023 م
منشور وزير الاقتصاد والتجارة رقم 4 لسنة 2023 م
Circular 4-2023 requests all public companies and government agencies funded from the general budget to commit to giving priority to supplies from the local market, especially those manufactured and produced locally when contracting for the procurement of materials and supplies they need.
Coverage Horizontal
LIBYA
Since October 2024
Pillar Public procurement of ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Other limitations on foreign participation in public procurement
Decision No. 600 of 2024 issuing the Administrative Contracts Regulation
قرار رقم 600 لسنة 2024 م بإصدار لائحة العقود الإدارية
قرار رقم 600 لسنة 2024 م بإصدار لائحة العقود الإدارية
Art. 106 of the Administrative Contracts Regulation stipulates that contractors are required to use nationally sourced materials and products of local origin, including those that are manufactured or semi-manufactured domestically, as well as other materials and equipment available on the local market, provided that such items conform to the agreed technical specifications and are offered at competitive prices.
Coverage Horizontal
LIBYA
Reported in 2022, last reported in 2025
Pillar Public procurement of ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Other limitations on foreign participation in public procurement
Reported lack of transparency in public procurement
It is reported that procurement processes are frequently characterised by opacity and fragmentation across multiple agencies, with a recurrent reliance on non-competitive procedures and limited public disclosure of procurement plans, contract awards, and implementation outcomes. It is further reported that foreign enterprises regard corruption as a significant impediment to foreign direct investment, which remains pervasive across virtually all sectors of the economy, particularly within government procurement.
Coverage Horizontal
Sources
- https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/148/article-A001-en.xml
- https://web.archive.org/web/20251211213157/https://www.state.gov/reports/2025-investment-climate-statements/libya
- https://web.archive.org/web/20231201085458/https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-investment-climate-statements/libya/
- Show more...
LIBYA
N/A
Pillar Public procurement of ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Signatory of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) with coverage of the most relevant services sectors (CPC 752, 754, 84)
Lack of participation in the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA)
Libya is not a party to the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), nor does it have observer status. In fact, Libya is not a Member of the WTO.
Coverage Horizontal
SOUTH AFRICA
N/A
Pillar Online sales and transactions |
Indicator Threshold for ‘De Minimis’ rule
Lack of de minimis threshold
South Africa does not implement any de minimis threshold, which is the minimum value of goods below which customs do not charge duties. However, it is reported that there is an informal threshold of USD 35.
Coverage Horizontal
SOUTH AFRICA
Since April 2009
Pillar Online sales and transactions |
Indicator Framework for consumer protection applicable to online commerce
The Consumer Protection Act No. 68 of 2008 (CPA)
The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) provides a comprehensive framework for consumer protection that also applies to online transactions. Section 43 of the Act establishes specific requirements for online retailers and other suppliers of goods and services who conduct transactions with consumers over the Internet or other electronic channels.
Coverage Horizontal
SOUTH AFRICA
N/A
Pillar Online sales and transactions |
Indicator Ratification of the UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts
Lack of signature of the UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts
South Africa has not signed the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts.
Coverage Horizontal
SOUTH AFRICA
Since 2002
Pillar Online sales and transactions |
Indicator UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce
UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce
South Africa has adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Commerce.
Coverage Horizontal
SOUTH AFRICA
N/A
Pillar Online sales and transactions |
Indicator UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures
Lack of adoption of UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures
South Africa has not adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Signatures.
Coverage Horizontal
SOUTH AFRICA
Reported in 2017, last reported in 2023
Pillar Technical standards applied to ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Self-certification for product safety
Lack of self-declaration of conformity
The South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) implements a program for the issuance of Certificates of Compliance (CoCs) for Electromagnetic Interference/Compatibility (EMI/EMC) of electrical and electronic goods, including an annual non-refundable fee paid by manufacturers for each CoC, fees for registering factories, and fees for model name changes. The program also requires manufacturers to have EMI/EMC testing done at SABS-verified third-party labs. If testing is required from an independent lab that is not SABS verified, the manufacturer must request that the lab be verified through SABS at the expense of the lab. Ultimately, the regulation is meant to ensure that all electronic equipment entering South Africa meets the required quality-performance standards. However, it is reported that some industry stakeholders have raised concerns that the five-fold increase in certification costs, the additional administrative burden, and the lack of resources in South Africa to support the procedure might extend the time to market for quickly evolving and obsolescing information and communication technology products. South Africa still accepts test results from International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation-certified labs. Still, SABS also conducts a comprehensive review of the test results to ensure that the product meets South African EMC standards. The protracted review can take up to 18 months to complete, during which time the product may become obsolete.
Section 3 of the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications Act, 2008 (Act No. 5 of 2008) establishes the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications (NRCS) and empowers it to regulate the compulsory specifications of any product or service in South Africa. In addition, Section 35 of the Electronic Communications Act 36 of 2005 requires that the telecom authority approves digital products before they are used in the country.
Section 3 of the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications Act, 2008 (Act No. 5 of 2008) establishes the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications (NRCS) and empowers it to regulate the compulsory specifications of any product or service in South Africa. In addition, Section 35 of the Electronic Communications Act 36 of 2005 requires that the telecom authority approves digital products before they are used in the country.
Coverage Horizontal
Sources
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230604030513/https://www.vde.com/resource/blob/1670198/9e1907ec84b33b8a78acc9a02e034b9c/notice-of-sabs-data.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220727123819/https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/a36-050.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220627104712/https://www.icasa.org.za/uploads/files/Memorandum-of-Understanding-Between-ICASA-and-SABS-March-2016.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230329101101/https://www.icasa.org.za/pages/type-approval
- https://web.archive.org/web/20240329151539/https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2023-03/2023%20NTE%20Report.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230321081515/https://ib-lenhardt.com/type-approval/south-africa
- https://web.archive.org/web/20231207093340/https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/312167280.pdf
- Show more...
SOUTH AFRICA
Since August 2002
Pillar Technical standards applied to ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Restrictions on encryption standards
Electronic Communications and Transaction Act, 2002
According to Art. 29 of the Electronic Communications and Transaction Act, the Director-General of the Department of Communications must establish and maintain a register of cryptography and record the following particulars in respect of providers, such as the name and address of the cryptography provider, a description of the type of cryptography service or cryptography product other particulars as may be prescribed to identify and locate the cryptography provider or its products or services adequately. Moreover, according to Section 40 of the ECA, a foreign cryptographer must be registered with the Department of Communications as such prior to rendering cryptography services and supplying cryptography products in (or to persons in) South Africa. This registration obligation applies to foreign cryptography providers rendering their services or selling their products in South Africa.
Coverage Encryption services
