According to Section 9 of the Companies Act, at least 50% of the board of directors of a limited liability company must be European Economic Area (EEA) residents unless granted an exemption by the Swedish Companies Registration Office.

Amendments to the Protective Security Act 2018 (PSA) grant the Swedish Government the authority to oversee and potentially block investments that may threaten national security. The Act also empowers Swedish security services and armed forces to conduct security inspections on firms operating in sectors deemed critical to national security and, if necessary, revoke operating licenses if breaches are identified. One of the sectors covered by this legislation is telecommunications. The Act deliberately refrains from providing a detailed definition of "security-sensitive activity". According to Chapter 1, Section 1 of the PSA, security-sensitive activities include (i) activities crucial to Sweden's security or (ii) activities bound by an international protective security commitment that Sweden has undertaken. It is reported that the preparatory works of the PSA suggest that activities within certain sectors may be considered security sensitive, such as essential services related to electronic communications, including operational centres, key interconnection points with equipment for traffic exchange and signalling, and major transmission networks, as well as key civil infrastructure like stations for electronic communications, 5G technologies, and radio and TV.
The PSA has been used by the Swedish security services to ban Huawei from operating in Sweden in 2020, as they deemed the equipment to pose a security risk to the country.

In December 2023, the Act (2023:560) on the Screening of Foreign Direct Investments entered into force, introducing substantial changes to the regulatory framework governing foreign investments in Sweden. According to Art. 7 of the law, foreign investors engaging in sensitive sectors are mandated to secure authorisation from the reviewing authority before executing the investment. The authority holds the power to approve, conditionally approve, or prohibit the investment based on considerations related to public order or national security.
The FDI Act applies to investments in undertakings with a registered office in Sweden, including indirect transfers of shares and transfers of shares in listed companies. According to Art. 7, any prospective foreign investor in protected activities notify the inspection authority before investing if: (i) they would hold 10% or more of the votes in a relevant entity, (ii) acquire or form an entity engaging in protected activities, (iii) become a partner in a trading company conducting such activities, (iv) form a foundation engaging in these activities, or (v) gain direct or indirect influence over the management of entities or foundations involved in protected activities.
The Act covers various sectors, including essential services, security-sensitive activities (as defined in Art. 2 of the Protective Security Act), the processing of sensitive personal data or location data, the processing of sensitive personal data or location data, research or the supply of products or technology relating to emerging technologies and other strategically protected technologies.

It has been reported that patent filing fees for foreign applicants in Sweden are higher than those for domestic applicants. The Swedish Patent and Registration Office (PRV) suggests that non-residents may need to engage a local agent to file a patent. According to the Swedish Intellectual Property Office, fees for foreign patent applications range from 140 to 18,610 SEK (approximately 13 to 1,700 USD), while fees for domestic applicants range from 150 to 8,450 SEK (approximately 14 to 800 USD). Additionally, inventions made in Sweden that have implications for national security require authorisation from the Swedish patent office before they can be filed abroad.

Sweden is a party to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

There is no general principle for the use of copyright-protected material comparable to the fair use/fair dealing principles. Directive 2001/29/EC defines an optional but exhaustive set of limitations from the author´s exclusive rights under the control of the “three-step test” in line with the Berne Convention that establishes three cumulative conditions to the limitations and exceptions of a copyright holder’s rights. The Directive has been transposed by Member States with significant freedom.
The Swedish Act on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works was amended to be consistent with the Directive, but Sweden applies copyright exceptions very narrowly, choosing not to employ the three-step test. The economic rights conferred by the Copyright Act are relaxed in cases of making physical copies for private or educational use or when an author has previously authorised the reproduction of the work in the EEA (the Consumption Principle). However, Section 12 of the Copyright Act explicitly excludes creating digital copies of copyrighted material or making copies of computer programs and software, and a 2016 ruling by the Swedish Supreme Court found that posting photos of public art online was not consistent with Swedish copyright law.

The European Union and Sweden have adopted the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty. The treaty was ratified on 14 December 2009 and came into effect on 14 March 2010.

The European Union and Sweden have adopted the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Performances and Phonograms Treaty. The treaty was ratified on 14 December 2009 and came into effect on 14 March 2010.

Sudan lacks a comprehensive framework for consumer protection that applies to online transactions.

Sudan has not signed the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts.

Sudan has not adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Commerce.

Sudan has not adopted national legislation based on or influenced by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Signatures.

Type approval procedures in Sudan are regulated by the Telecommunications and Post Regulatory Authority (TPRA). It is reported that the homologation process in Sudan does not require local laboratory testing or contact with local representatives. However, a product sample can be requested from the authority for viewing.