PHILIPPINES
N/A
Pillar Intermediary liability |
Indicator Safe harbour for intermediaries for copyright infringement
Limited safe harbour for intermediaries for copyright infringement
A basic legal framework on intermediary liability for copyright infringement is absent in Philippine law and jurisprudence. Arguably, safe harbour clauses are present in the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000 (RA 8792) and the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175). However, the definition of an intermediary in these laws limits its capacity to provide a safe harbour. Particularly, RA 8792’s scope is limited to electronic documents, while RA 10175 is limited to cybercrimes defined under the law. This makes safe harbours in Philippine law sectoral or content-specific.
Coverage Intermediaries
Sources
PHILIPPINES
N/A
Pillar Intermediary liability |
Indicator Safe harbour for intermediaries for any activity other than copyright infringement
Limited safe harbour for intermediaries for any activity other than copyright infringement
A basic legal framework on intermediary liability beyond copyright infringement is absent in Philippine law and jurisprudence. Arguably, safe harbour clauses are present in the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000 (RA 8792) and the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175). However, the definition of an intermediary in these laws limits its capacity to provide a safe harbour. Particularly, RA 8792’s scope is limited to electronic documents, while RA 10175 is limited to cybercrimes defined under the law. This makes safe harbours in Philippine law sectoral or content-specific.
Coverage Intermediaries
Sources
PHILIPPINES
Since July 2022
Pillar Intermediary liability |
Indicator User identity requirement
Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) Card Registration Act
According to Art. 5 of the Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) Card Registration Act, the Philippines imposes an identity requirement for SIM registration. Anyone wanting to purchase a SIM card has to provide their national ID card or a passport in case of foreigners to activate a new prepaid SIM card.
Coverage Telecommunications sector
PHILIPPINES
Reported in 2022, last reported in 2023
Pillar Content access |
Indicator Blocking or filtering of commercial web content
Blocking or filtering of commercial web content
In June 2022, the national security advisor of the Philippines requested the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) to block 27 websites, alleging their affiliation with "Communist-Terrorist" groups and citing the Anti-Terror Act as justification. The targeted websites included Philippine news sites Bulatlat and Pinoy Weekly, as well as several affiliated with the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP). Some users experienced difficulty accessing Bulatlat and Pinoy Weekly following the blocking order. Toward the end of August 2022, Bulatlat reportedly became accessible again after a regional trial court found the NTC in indirect contempt of an earlier court injunction favouring the outlet. Despite the decision to restore access to Bulatlat, the NTC's blocking order remained in force. In October 2022, the same regional trial court reaffirmed its writ of preliminary injunction against the NTC despite appeals from the commission, ensuring continued access to Bulatlat and, in effect, to the other listed websites as well. As of June 2023, reports indicate that some of the 27 websites remained blocked on certain networks.
Coverage Online websites
PHILIPPINES
Reported in 2024
Pillar Content access |
Indicator Presence of Internet shutdowns
Presence of Internet shutdowns
The indicator "6.2.4 - Government Internet shut down in practice" of the V-Dem Dataset, which measures whether the government has the technical capacity to actively make internet service cease, thus interrupting domestic access to the internet or whether the government has decided to do so, has a score of 3 in Philippines for the year 2023. This corresponds to "Rarely but there have been a few occasions throughout the year when the government shut down domestic access to Internet."
Coverage Horizontal
PHILIPPINES
Since June 1991, last amended in March 2022
Since June 2022
Since June 2022
Pillar Content access |
Indicator Restrictions on online advertising
Foreign Investment Act of 1991 - Republic Act No. 7042
Executive Order No. 175 Promulgating the Twelfth Regular Foreign Investment Negative List
Executive Order No. 175 Promulgating the Twelfth Regular Foreign Investment Negative List
The Foreign Investment Act requires the publication of the Foreign Investment Negative List (FINL) every two years, which outlines sectors in which foreign investment is restricted. According to List A of the 2022 FINL, advertising is limited to 30% foreign equity.
Coverage Advertising sector
Sources
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220929071503/https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/downloads/2022/06jun/20220627-EO-175-RRD.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20240614015820/https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-laws/laws/95/print/3
- https://web.archive.org/web/20231206155654/https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-investment-climate-statements/the-philippines/
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220628093955/https://www.philstar.com/business/2022/06/28/2191529/duterte-approves-eo-updating-foreign-investment-rules
- https://web.archive.org/web/20231205182544/https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/the-philippines-12th-foreign-investment-negative-list/
- https://research.hktdc.com/en/article/MTEzNzE1NzIwMw
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230202090011/https://neda.gov.ph/neda-welcomes-the-issuance-of-the-12th-regular-foreign-investment-negative-list/
- Show more...
PHILIPPINES
Since August 2017
Pillar Quantitative trade restrictions for ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Other import restrictions, including non-transparent/discriminatory import procedures
Republic Act No. 10697 - Strategic Trade Management Act, particularly the National Strategic Goods List - Annex 2: List of dual use strategic goods
In 2017, the Philippine government enacted the Philippine National Strategic Goods List Annex 2, regulating the strategic dual-use items for both export and import for national security reasons. Some of these dual-use items are electronics and computers that reach a specific technical level that qualifies them as fit for military use.
Coverage Dual use strategic goods, which refers to a broad list of products (e.g., electronics and computers)
PHILIPPINES
Reported in 2015, last reported in 2023
Pillar Quantitative trade restrictions for ICT goods and online services |
Indicator Other import restrictions, including non-transparent/discriminatory import procedures
Lack of transparency in customs procedures
Corruption and irregularities in customs processing in the Philippines are reported to persist, including incidents of undue and costly delays, irregularities in the valuation process, inspection and 100% verification of some goods, and inconsistent assessment of fees.
Coverage Horizontal
Sources
- https://web.archive.org/web/20240406190045/https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2023-03/2023%20NTE%20Report.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230919071254/https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2022%20National%20Trade%20Estimate%20Report%20on%20Foreign%20Trade%20Barriers.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230919071332/https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2015%20NTE%20Combined.pdf
- Show more...
PHILIPPINES
Since May 2001, entry into force in August 2001
Pillar Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) |
Indicator Participation in the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)
Patent Cooperation Treaty
The Philippines is a party to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
Coverage Horizontal
PHILIPPINES
Since June 1997
Pillar Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) |
Indicator Copyright law with clear exceptions
Republic Act No. 8293, prescribing the intellectual property code and establishing the intellectual property office, providing for its powers and functions, and for other purposes
The Philippines has a clear regime of copyright exceptions that follows fair use, which enables the lawful use of copyrighted work by others without obtaining permission (Republic Act No. 8293). Sections 184-190 list the exceptions, which include the recitation or performance of a work once it has been lawfully made accessible to the public if done privately and free of charge or if made strictly for a charitable or religious institution or society; the making of quotations from a published work if they are compatible with fair use and only to the extent justified for the purpose, including quotations from newspaper articles and periodicals in the form of press summaries; the reproduction or communication to the public by mass media of articles on current political, social, economic, scientific or religious topic, lectures, addresses and other works of the same nature; among others.
Coverage Horizontal
PHILIPPINES
Reported in 2022, last reported in 2024
Pillar Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) |
Indicator Enforcement of copyright online
Lack of adequate enforcement of copyright online
Copyright is not adequately enforced online in the Philippines. Although the country has made progress in intellectual property (IP) protection and enforcement since 2014, rights holders have raised concerns about increasing online piracy, ineffective IP enforcement due to limited capacity and expertise, and slow prosecution and conviction of cases.
Coverage Horizontal
PHILIPPINES
Since July 2002, entry into force in October 2002
Pillar Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) |
Indicator Adoption of the WIPO Copyright Treaty
WIPO Copyright Treaty
The Philippines has ratified the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty.
Coverage Horizontal
PHILIPPINES
Since July 2002, entry into force in October 2002
Pillar Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) |
Indicator Adoption of the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty
WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty
The Philippines has ratified the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Performances and Phonograms Treaty.
Coverage Horizontal
PHILIPPINES
N/A
Pillar Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) |
Indicator Effective protection covering trade secrets
Lack of comprehensive regulatory framework covering trade secrets
The Philippines lacks a comprehensive framework in place that provides effective protection of trade secrets, but there are limited measures addressing some issues related to them. According to Section 4 of the Intellectual Property Code, the protection of undisclosed information as an independent Intellectual Property right is recognised. In addition, the Revised Penal Code prohibits the unauthorised revelation of secrets or confidential information by either private individuals or public officers. Moreover, the Supreme Court ruling (Air Philippines Corporation v. Pennswell, Inc.) has extensively discussed the concept and defined a trade secret as a plan or process, tool, mechanism or compound known only to its owner and those of employees to whom it is necessary to confide it.
Coverage Horizontal
Sources
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230205173609/https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/488675
- https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-018-1440?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true
- https://web.archive.org/web/20231123040816/https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/PHL_revised_penal_code.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20240614010015/https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2007decemberdecisions.php?id=1435
- Show more...
PHILIPPINES
N/A
Pillar Telecom infrastructure & competition |
Indicator Passive infrastructure sharing obligation
Lack of obligation to share passive infrastructure
It is reported that there is no obligation for passive infrastructure sharing in the Philippines to deliver telecom services to end users, and it is not practised in both the mobile and fixed sectors based on commercial agreements.
Coverage Telecommunications sector
